Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Intern Emerg Med ; 16(8): 2077-2086, 2021 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1152109

RESUMEN

A significant decline in the admission to intensive cardiac care unit (ICCU) has been noted in Italy during the COVID-19 outbreak. Previous studies have provided data on clinical features and outcome of these patients, but information is still incomplete. In this multicenter study conducted in six ICCUs, we enrolled consecutive adult patients admitted to ICCU in three specific time intervals: from February 8 to March 9, 2020 [before national lockdown (pre-LD)], from March 10 to April 9, 2020 [during the first period of national lockdown (in-LD)] and from May 18 to June 17, 2020 [soon after the end of all containment measures (after-LD)]. Compared to pre-LD, in-LD was associated with a significant drop in the admission to ICCU for all causes (- 35%) and acute coronary syndrome (ACS; - 49%), with a rebound soon after-LD. The in-LD reduction was greater for women (- 49%) and NSTEMI (- 61%) compared to men (- 28%) and STEMI (- 33%). Length-of-stay, and in-hospital mortality did not show any significant change from to pre-LD to in-LD in the whole population as well as in the ACS group. This study confirms a notable reduction in the admissions to ICCUs from pre-LD to in-LD followed by an increment in the admission rates after-LD. These data strongly suggest that people, particularly women and patients with NSTEMI, are reluctant to seek medical care during lockdown, possibly due to the fear of viral infection. Such a phenomenon, however, was not associated with a rise in mortality among patients who get hospitalization.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , Unidades de Cuidados Coronarios , Infarto del Miocardio sin Elevación del ST/epidemiología , Admisión del Paciente/tendencias , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , COVID-19/terapia , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio sin Elevación del ST/terapia , Admisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Medición de Riesgo
3.
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc ; 30: 100600, 2020 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-665773

RESUMEN

On March 11th 2020 the World Health Organization declared the pandemic infection of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) and Italy was one of the most affected country. The regional Emergency Medical System (EMS) founded itself facing an exponential increase in hospitalizations with a consequent organizational system crisis. Experts from Cina, UK and US suggested to reconsider thrombolysis as the best treatment in term of balance between time consumption and operators safety for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients respect to primary PCI (pPCI). The system reorganization consisted in a centralization of all the emergency nets: from 55 hospitals with cardiac catheterization laboratories distributed within our region offering a 24/7 service we passed to 13 Hub and 42 Spoke centres. Dedicated in-hospital paths for patients COVID positive or suspected (pCOV+) and COVID negative (pCOV-) were instituted. We analysed all consecutive patients undergoing emergency coronary angiogram from March 14 to April 14, 2020 at San Carlo Hospital in Milan comparing the two different in-hospital paths. We collected 30 STEMI patients. Eighteen patients (60%) were treated in pCOV-, while twelve patients (40%) in pCOV+. No significant differences were found among the two groups regarding key time points of STEMI care and interestingly we didn't find any treatment delay in pCOV+. In conclusion, a focused overhaul of the EMS may allow to maintain pPCI as the treatment of choice for patients and operators.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA